Leaderboard

We have nothing to be ashamed about as everyone is entitled to their opinions whether others agree or not. Obviously you have strong views and others have strong views on this topic, but your other statement wasn't necessary. Maybe everyone should agree to disagree.

Your a pig Mate,nothing short of it. All three groups that are on the council have more members than RFSA individually. What you need to get into your head is - SA voted- - RFSA is gone as the representative body July 1. The Ministers Recreational Fishing Advisory Council is on the table now. This Council and the Minister will then decide the best approach for forming the Representative body to replace RFSA. FB is only one avenue to communicate - but powerful enough to convince a Government to make change. We are having a get together night soon, all those that fought for change wi

A few more issues, expanding on previous items. - This is a new body, no current organisations are being made defunct per se. - It appears to be "merely" an occassional advice conduit to the Minister, and not much more. And an "add-on" organisation at that. - Who will be performing the current peak body functionality and routine grunt-work of DEWNR and PIRSA departmental liaison, talking to SABCPFA, councils... dam access, artificial reefs, etc etc? - Who will all those other parties approach as needed? - Will RFSA be in a position to do this once the MRFAC is established, and/o

Yes it is warranted, as this bloke has repeatedly attacked me personally. His posts are slanderous !

Evening all, Agree with the previous posts, although I think 'apathy' might be a bit strong. 'Apathy' has been an overused cop-out term within SA Rec fishing circles for decades. Although it certainly does exist, "apathy' doesn't mean the same thing as "I want change, but I can't be buggered fighting with the SA rec fishing system", and if surveys are going to be distorted or ignored - why bother? But regardless of anyone's level of interest, it's hard to engage with a representative system that didn't work very well and didn't welcome 'outsiders'. The SA rec fishing representative s

Folks, what I am seeing here seems very much to be at best a sideways step. At best. May be actually a step backwards, ironically. "Unintended" consequences potentially, albeit not entirely "unforeseen". Start with the PIRSA masthead (a "hmmm" there for a start) and look through the highlighted bits in context. 180831 Subsequent Highlights - MRFAC Consultation Paper A4 74401.pdf